Bahrain Key If Saudi-Iran Lock Is To Be
Opened
Saeed Naqvi
President Mohammad Morsi
has barely been ousted and, lo and behold, the Palestinian-Israeli peace
process is already on track. It was important that Morsi vacated the scene for
the process to be salvaged because the Muslim Brotherhood had firm links with
Hamas with whom talks were unthinkable. So the losers along with the Brothers
in Egypt are all the Brotherhood enthusiasts in the region – Qatar, Turkey,
Hamas, Tunisia. This reverses key political trends in the region.
European Union’s Foreign
Policy Chief, Catherine Ashton, obtained from Gen. Abdul Fattah el Sissi the
permission to meet Morsi who is confined in a secret location. This
“reasonableness” on the part of the army chief “humanizes” him just enough for
the US to abide by the financial commitments to Egypt which underpin the
country’s 1979 Peace Treaty with Israel. Little wonder, Israelis have been
imploring Washington not to declare Morsi’s ouster a coup. Under US law, Gen.
Sissi would forfeit American largesse if he is seen to be a “coup leader”.
After her meeting with Morsi,
Ms. Ashton suggested to Egypt’s Defence Minister that the Brothers be part of
any future power structure. There is no evidence her suggestion has been taken
seriously.
Ms. Ashton ought to know
that in the region, much more important than her views are the views of Saudi
Arabia. In the case of Egypt, the Saudis have hammered in the point. As soon as
the tide turned against Morsi, they along with their GCC Sheikhdoms, handed
twelve billion dollars to the Egyptian army by way of gratitude. Billions more
will follow. Saudis do not like systems where “popular will” is constantly
invoked. They would be most comfortable with Gen. Sissi transformed into
President Sissi. Mark my word.
There are some obvious
expectations the present regime in Cairo has of Riyadh. One expectation, the
Saudis have already fulfilled – financial, along which almost automatically
comes political support. Saudis will also be expected to leverage their
influence on the Salafists or the al Noor party so that the post Morsi structure
is not destabilized by extremism.
In Syria the opposition
backed by Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Britain, France, Israel and the United
States are on the losing side. Shouldn’t a journalist who predicted this
outcome two years ago be applauded? As the regime in Damascus makes gains each
day, the chances of Geneva II recede farther into the background. In fact the
very idea of Geneva II is embarrassing for the US, Saudi, Israel led coalition.
Bashar al Assad can organize a delegation in a jiffy, but who will put together
a delegation from the countless groups losing the fight in Syria?
Meanwhile, the
inauguration of President Hassan Rouhani in Teheran on August 4 will provide an
embarrassing contrast to the anti democratic Arab scene. Britain’s ex Foreign
Secretary, Jack Straw and ex EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana will attend
the ceremonies. This will be signal enough to others who will doubtless follow.
India has already upgraded its representation – Vice President Hamid Ansari who
has been ambassador to Iran.
There is enough good
sense in Riyadh to realize that sectarian conflict is no substitute for
strategy towards Teheran. Competition between Riyadh and Teheran is inevitable.
Equally, open hostility is unsustainable.
The key to a Riyadh-Teheran
rapprochement is Bahrain. A 37 Km causeway links Saudi Arabia’s oil bearing,
Shia dominated Eastern province to this small Kingdom, which is also home to
the US Fifth Fleet. Neither the Saudis nor the Americans will abandon their key
interests. This much is clear.
Likewise, it is inhuman
that the staunchly Sunni regime in Bahrain, should treat 80 per cent of the
population, all Shias, as the “opposition”. This majority population has faced
state repression for demanding their human rights since the Arab Spring first
stirred.
Two years ago, the US had
taken an initiative to broker an agreement between the two sides.
For over 200 years, the
Khalifa family have been emirs of Bahrain. A decade ago, Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa
declared himself king. Kingship has a built in dynastic possibility: a crown
prince, in this case Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa al Khalifa. There is also
room for reform. Bahrain can easily become a constitutional monarchy, should
circumstances so demand.
With royal courts come
court intrigues. The King’s uncle, Khalifa Ibn Salman al Khalifa has been Prime
Minister from the day the king ascended the throne. It is universally
acknowledged in Bahrain that not only is he the most powerful man in the
kingdom but also the most corrupt. I heard this from all sides in Bahrain.
When the Arab Spring
first swept through Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, people came out on the streets
in almost every West Asian capital. In no instance was the state structure exposed
as being more tilted against its own people. As demonstrations invited brutal
crackdown by the armed police, mostly Pakistani conscripts, Bahrain’s friends
began to see the structure as untenable.
Americans took a welcome
initiative. US envoy Jeffery Feltman, sketched a compromise agreement between
Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa al Khalifa and a moderate Shia leader,
Sheikh Ali Salman. Sheikh Salman was in tears when I met him. “The Prime
Minister has killed all chances of peace.”
Before the agreement
could even be discussed, which would give the Shias reasonable representation
in the state structure, the Prime Minister mobilized the support of the then
Saudi hard line Interior Security Chief, Prince Nayef. Saudi tanks and GCC
armoured personnel carriers rolled down the Saudi-Bahrain causeway. That was
the knee jerk response two years ago. The Saudis are much wiser now that the
Spring has turned to Autumn. Should not the Feltman initiative be picked up now
that both the Americans and the Saudis may be looking to open the Iranian lock
of which Bahrain is the key?
#
#
#
#
# #
No comments:
Post a Comment