2016
Hodge-Podge: Cricket, Pakistan, Russia, Syria And Israel
Saeed Naqvi
One enters 2016 with some happy
thoughts. Some anxieties too.
Of New Delhi’s umpteen dailies,
three had photographs of spin bowlers on the shoulders of their page one on the
last day of the year. There were two photographs of R. Ashwin and one of Moeen
Ali who helped England beat South Africa at Durban. Two days ago Nathan Lyon,
the Australian off spinner was declared man-of-match against the West Indies at
Melbourne.
The return of the spinner in
2016 promises to relieve the monotony of pace attack as the only armour in the
bowling arsenal. The spinner, with loops of varying heights, a turn both ways and
a doubly deceptive capacity to go straight, offers a more intellectual
engagement. It causes the batsman to use his feet, reflect. What reflection
when Mitchell Starc hurls thunderbolts at 160 kms? Lightening reflex, yes.
I can never forget the hush that
descended on Feroz Shah Kotla in Delhi, when Bishan Singh Bedi was handed the
ball as first change. What magic was he going to weave around the batsman? The
performance of Ashwin and Jadeja in the recent seasons could well promise the
return of an era of spinners. Yasir Shah, Sunil Narine, Imran Tahir, Rangana Herath
and others mentioned above signal the return of the spinner in international
cricket.
The other happy development is
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s surprise stopover at Lahore on his way back from
Moscow and Kabul. There is a cricketing question attached to this initiative. A
series of meetings are scheduled but there is hesitation to play what would be
the world’s most watched test series.
After the bitterness between the
countries in the recent past, a full blown cricket tour by Pakistan to India
may strain emotions. But if there is any sincerity in Modi’s Lahore visit, an
abridged test series, even in a neutral venue, could be an initiative that
would help soften the atmosphere.
The Lahore initiative would be
credible only if there is evidence of a changing mindset among the ruling elite.
The air has to be slowly cleared of Indo-Pak and Hindu-Muslim tension. A
cricket series with the right political backing can go a long way in clearing
the air. But if communal polarization is the electoral requirement for, say,
the 2016 State elections in Assam, West Bengal and Kerala, improved relations
with Pakistan cannot be seriously on the BJP’s agenda.
Arrival of carved rocks for
construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, or BJP MP Hukum Singh and MLA Suresh
Rana holding Mahapanchayats in Shamli and Muzaffarnagar where large scale anti
Muslim pogrom took place in 2013, confirm ones worst fears. There is no
intention to keep aggressive Hindutva in check.
If this, indeed, is to be the
policy, it will be totally incompatible with any effort at peace with Pakistan.
I have a theory of the triangle
for sub continental peace. India-Pakistan, New Delhi-Srinagar and Hindu-Muslim
as one triangular complex of issues. It is elementary geometry that a contradiction
or expansion of any one of the lines or angles will impact on the other two. Indo-Pak
peace will immediately bring down Hindu-Muslim temperatures and cause Srinagar
to wonder if some sort of a settlement is round the corner.
Since such a settlement is nowhere
in sight, any meaningful progress on the Indo-Pak track is simply not possible.
There is a further complication. If Hindu consolidation is the strategic aim of
Hindutva, of which the BJP is a part, minorities will be required as the
“other”. This again flies in the face of Indo-Pak normalization as a BJP
priority. There are impediments to peace on the Pakistani side too.
This is not to argue that peace
is impossible. Indeed, South Block is feeling extremely buoyant after the Prime
Minister’s Moscow visit where “make in India” received a boost in nuclear and
defence fields. In fact, two nuclear plants for Bangladesh will be a joint
Indo-Russian project. New Delhi with friends not just in one bloc but in many
places feels that much more secure to make appropriate advances towards
Pakistan.
Also India takes over as
President of BRICS in February. This will entail two Putin visits in 2016 – one
to attend the BRICS summit and another overdue bilateral visit. The Chinese
President, Xi Jinping will also be here for BRICS. Absence of normalization
with Pakistan will stand in the way of India taking advantage of gas pipelines
from Central Asia or the Chinese Silk Route initiative.
Modi will be in Islamabad for
the 2016 SAARC summit. Between SAARC and BRICS so much can be achieved with a
Pakistan which is inclined to be in step.
It turns out that almost the
first important Arab leader to visit New Delhi in the New Year (in fact in January)
will be Syrian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Walid Muallem,
carrying a message from President Bashar al Assad.
The Prime Minister, fresh from
his conversations with Putin, will ofcourse note the similarity of views
between Moscow and Damascus. He will find these views not out of sync with
those being spelt out by Secretary of State John Kerry either. Muallem’s inputs
will be crucial because in January begins the process of identifying Syrian opposition
groups who will sit at the table along with the official Syrian delegation to
focus on government formation in Syria. A huge difference of opinion has
erupted on who is a terrorist. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Jordanian lists of
terrorists in Syria differ. Ofcourse India has an abiding interest in the
outcome but does New Delhi have a role? Muallem may have a suggestion.
Soon Foreign Minister Sushma
Swaraj will have occasion to compare Muallem’s version with what is furnished
to her in Tel Aviv which she visits soon. She may discern in Israel that the
Jewish State’s favourite candidate in the US elections is Hillary Clinton and
not Donald Trump despite his brazen overtures to Bibi Netanyahu.
It is all happening in the New
Year.
# # # #
With reasonably solid fundamentals, India seems to have the most potential among its peers in BRICS, but our country struggles from high levels of poverty, political infighting and corruption. Global investor Marc Faber says that the slow pace of reforms in India is particularly disappointing. Top two global rating agencies also raised concerns about reforms and lowered their growth forecast. Indian Finance Minister Arun Jaitley projected that the Indian economy could grow by as much as 9% a year. However, the governor of the Reserve Bank of India Dr. Raghuram Rajan is of the opinion that India has always faced a gap between its promise and execution. Why is there no different economic policies of NDA and UPA, it looks correlative? Can Modi reach near his promises?
ReplyDeleteMMMFS STOCK FUTURE BUY GODREJCP ABOVE 732 TGTS 734-736-738 SL AT 728.90 LS 800
ReplyDeleteSTOCK FUTURE BUY CALL OF GODREJCP ACHIEVED TGT1 BOOK SOME PROFIT @734
Stock Future Tips