How Battle Of Karbala Conditions Iranian Mind On
Palestinian Issue
Saeed Naqvi
When the application
of normal yardsticks on Iran lead to results which analysts find unexpected, a
sort of irritation sets in. This is because of a distinct inability to
understand that, with the exception of the Vatican, Iran is the only state
where the leadership mindset is conditioned by theological concerns.
The epic
battle between good and evil is common to many traditions including the one
which brings us good cheer during Dussehra, when Ravana is killed. But these
traditions are part of mythology.
Iranians,
indeed Shias anywhere, contemplate the epic battle between Right and Wrong in
historical terms. The battle of Karbala, fought on the bank of the Euphrates River
in Iraq is, after all, an event that took place in 680 AD. The first military
probe into India by Mohammad bin Qasim took place in 711 AD. By an amazing
coincidence, 711 AD also happens to be the year when Tariq Ibn Ziyad crossed
the stretch of water from Tangiers in Morocco and conquered the rock which he
called Jabal al Tariq. Jabal means a rock. The British renamed it Gibraltar.
The point is
that the Shias latched on to Karbala, a relatively recent event in history, as the
ideal for morality and sacrifice. Let me explain. The great achievement of
Prophet Mohammad was to settle the differences between quarrelling Arab tribes.
In fact, Islam taking advantage of the vacuum in global power, soon expanded
into an Empire. Fissures reappeared after the Prophet’s death in 632 AD. By 680
AD, a usurper, Yazid, entrenched as the Governor of Damascus, turned to the prophet’s
younger grandson, Imam Hussain, to endorse his rule. Legitimacy would always
elude him without Hussain’s endorsement. Relentless pressure caused Hussain to
leave his ailing daughter in Medina and travel to Iraq. On the second of
Moharram (September this year) he entered Karbala along with 72 of his closest
relatives and friends.
When Hussain
would not submit to Yazid’s dictat, sanctions (note the word) were imposed. In the
torrid heat of the desert, water supply from the Euphrates was cut off. Children
as young as six months, crying for three days without water would, Yazid had
hoped, force a compromise. But on the question of principle, Hussain refused. On
the 10th day of Moharram all male members, one by one went into
battle against an overwhelmingly larger army, resulting in martyrdom – inspiring
some of the greatest epic poetry of all time. Women of the prophet’s household
were taken prisoners. And all because he would not compromise his core
principles.
Karbala is the
balance in which the clerical elements in the Iranian leadership measure rights-and-wrongs.
Much to the discomfiture of Israel, Iran’s consistency on the Palestinian issue
derives from these uncompromising belief systems. In other words, the principle
of Palestinian rights is non-negotiable. Well, in which case Iran exposes
itself to the most comprehensive sanctions Washington has imposed anywhere. But
Iran’s Foreign Minister, Javad Zarif told the Asia Society in New York
recently: “You must remember we have a PhD in coping with sanctions.”
Zarif could
not have meant that it is life as usual in Tehran despite the sanctions. By all
accounts, sanctions are hurting. Prices have risen sky high. But is this hurt
causing the population to congregate in city squares to curse the regime for
having invited US sanctions? Or is the opposite happening? Are people closing
ranks behind the regime for standing upto what mural size graffiti in Tehran
describes as the “great Satan”?
For a week,
shortages of baby diapers caused immense inconvenience. Soon the women in the
countryside rediscovered commonsense solutions: cut cloth dipped in Dettol into
triangular pieces, then pin the three points below the navel.
Why sanctions
are not pinching is that there is sufficient food on the table. For example,
meat consumption may have been pruned from four times a week to twice or even
once. But there is nourishment aplenty.
Is it possible
to apply comprehensive sanctions in a situation where, say, Qatar depends totally
on Iranian supplies because of Saudi sanctions? There are loopholes.
The Iranian drama
is being played out with a subtle give and take behind the scenes between the
hardliner Ayatullah Ali Khamenei and the moderate Hassan Rouhani. Khamenei was
always wary of negotiations with the US but it was his good political sense because
of which he went along with the public mood for engagement which Rouhani had
rightly gauged. But the President exceeded his brief when he called up
President Obama during the 2013 General Assembly session. The touch of over
eagerness was not Khamenei’s style. But he protected Rouhani, convinced that “Zionist
arrogance” will sooner or later hamper the Nuclear Deal coming to fruition. In that
sense Khamenei has proved right.
Simmering differences
manifested themselves at other levels too. Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, very
much the face of the nuclear deal, was slighted by hardliners like Gen. Qasim
Suleiman of the Al Quds Brigade causing Zarif to resign. What was the slight? During
Syrian President Bashar al Asad visit to Tehran, Zarif, was apparently kept out
of some meetings.
The unending
chant from Washington and Jerusalem that Iran should become a “normal state”
is, in the ultimate analysis, a demand for it to “soften” its stance on
Palestine. While all the focus has been on Iran, the Bahrain Conference has
with a sleight of hands worked towards formulations for virtually annexing the
West Bank.
Not unrelated
are developments in Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu must win the September elections
if he is to escape prison term for corruption. But such a victory can only be sustained
with extreme far right orthodox Jews who quite openly support an apartheid
state. And who stands by the side of the Palestinians? Iran, ofcourse. Always the
spoilsport.
# # # #
Very well said. You support your argument by cogent analysis. I remember the war between Iran and Iraq where you children fought and died for Iran. Iranian soldiers would go to the front reciting 'nuhas' and beating their chests.
ReplyDelete