The Calamitous Coronavirus,
Caste, Class And Colonialism
Saeed Naqvi
The
caravan of the dignified, despairing and the defeated will remain etched on my
mind like a Biblical catastrophe, custom made for a Cecil B De Mille
extravaganza.
Firaq
Gorakhpuri’s couplet is apt:
“Palat
rahe hain gharibul watan palatna tha,
woh
kucha ru kash e jannat ho ghar hai ghar phir bhi.”
(Those
in self exile are returning because they have no choice,
In
any case, these alien streets may have promised a paradise, but home is home
after all.)
In
Firaq’s framework the “exiles” are returning where idyll once was. In the swirl
of new economics, they may well be jumping from the frying pan into the fire. But
even so, as Garcia Marquez reminds us, “home is where someone of your’s is
buried.” That was where the multitudes were headed.
There
were always two lockdowns: a medical lockdown for “us” and an economic lockdown
for “them”. I am flattered that my sacrifice, in the course of this confinement,
qualifies me as one who “helped” the nation: I have stopped going to the gym in
the nearby hotel. People had made sacrifices, the Prime Minister said, by not
visiting gyms, malls, cinema, clubs etcetera during the lockdown.
Since
the gym is also patronized by hotel guests, many of whom are foreigners, there
was a real danger: I could have contracted the disease. I stopped visiting the
gym only in mid March. But once the lockdown was imposed our mobile would not
stop ringing. There was advice galore: Manju, who helps part time with cleaning
and dusting should be asked not to come. She may be a carrier. I did put
forward my plea for Manju. I was much more likely to infect her than she the
family. I was the one who met foreigners. Poor Manju met no one except her
frequently drunk husband.
I
was simply trying to be logical. My head is spinning with volumes of data on
the pandemic. Of the countless images, the one that has stayed in my mind is a
thick, wide band, in the same latitude as Wuhan, hanging in the air. This band
encircles all the countries intensely hit by the virus. We in India have been
sporadic recipients of the infection from visitors and Indians returning from
Italy, Spain, UK, Malaysia, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, the Gulf, US and, above
all, China. One has to make a return journey to Shanghai (as this reporter did)
to meet throngs of traders during the flight travelling to the remotest parts
of China.
What
does poor Manju have to do with international travelers? But we asked her not
to come for the time being. In doing so, I could not stop spotting in ourselves
an easy acceptance of segregation instinctively.
How
can I forget neighbours, indeed a cross section of metropolitan India on TV:
kitchenware transformed into drums, people blowing conch shells, clapping, leaning
over balconies of their high rise houses. Later, with equal enthusiasm, they lit
candles, and “mashaals” reminiscent of some forgotten victory. People were
celebrating because they were secure and protected from the virus. But with
Manju gone, who would scrape the floor of melted wax? Who would clean the
house? Then came word from the grapevine: her neighbours had joined the trek on
foot to heaven knows where.
This
calamitous experience has been a mirror, showing up the warts we had forgotten.
My wife and I were surprised by the response of friends we called. We were
trying to share our concern at the hundreds of thousands on the move. “Look
after yourselves” we were told. We were being advised not to be nosy. The
unstated message was transparent: those who had started walking to their
villages would be eventually looked after. Traces of “fatalism” we are heir to?
Socialist
leader Ram Manohar Lohia’s principal objection to the “class analysis” of the
communists was straightforward: “In India, class and caste is coterminous.” How
does Lohia’s dictum apply to the impoverished multitudes on the walk? Do they
all end up on the lower side of the caste divide?
I
suppose we have to bring in Manto to settle the issue: “the religion of an empty
stomach is Roti (bread).” In his scheme, shared distress is a greater equalizer
than all affirmative action. In this regard, there is a lesson in the profile
of the Indian indentured labour in South Africa, Fiji, West Indies, Mauritius
and Reunion. Shared experience on the sugar plantations was an “equalizer”.
Books by Fiji’s best known author, Satendra Nandan are replete with stories of
“Jahazbhais”. Jahaz or the ship which
carried them from the interiors of UP and Bihar became an unforgettable
experience in bonding.
The
narrative of the post Corona poor on the move is starkly different. The
indentured labour and their progeny turned their backs on their villages. They
placed whatever they had left behind on what Ghalib calls “taaqe nisiyan” or
the cornice of amnesia.
The
caravans of the famished on foot who balanced their tiny bundles on their heads,
to the contrary, turned towards the villages they had once abandoned. How will
they ever comprehend arcane viruses? Figures mean nothing to them. In 2017, for
instance, 87,000 children of ages upto four years died every month, mostly from
malnutrition. 938 adults died everyday from respiratory ailments. 1,421 from
diarrhea and so on. How will they ever understand that in the US an average of 79
per million of population had died from Corona virus as on April 15. The
comparable figure for India was 0.3 per million. They don’t know viruses. In a
daze, they are staring at another wolf salivating on them. A bigger shock
awaits when they reach their destinations: over 11,000 farmers commit suicide
each year. But we, in our apartments are grateful for being effectively
protected from the virus.
Let
Satendra Nandan, now Emeritus Professor at the Australian university, Canberra,
have the last word: “British colonialism was cruel to the indentured labour.
Our ancestors suffered. But consequences of colonial action look benign
compared to the experience of the migrant labour in his own country?”
# # # #
Mr. Naqvi, you just got a new fan :-)
ReplyDelete