For
Late M.F. Hussain, Rahat Indori Was “Just The Greatest”
Saeed Naqvi
Rahat Indori was five years old when the
much loved poet Majaz died of a stroke after he was found on the freezing terrace
of a country liquor shop in Lucknow’s Qaisar Bagh. As someone born to a poor
cloth mill labourer, Rahat’s nightmare of financial insecurity only increased
watching the economically circumscribed lives of Urdu poets. Majaz was only one
of them. Rahat worked hard educating himself right upto PhD on a subject which
was to stand him in good stead in subsequent years – Urdu Mushaira. And what a
performer he became in Mushairas charging upto Rs.10 lakhs for an appearance –
quite unprecedented.
A brief digression might help explain
the phenomenon of Rahat Indori, the Urdu poet who died in his hometown, at the
age of 70 last week. Govind Ballabh Pant, UP’s first Chief Minister and Union
Home Minister died on the same day as one of Urdu’s greatest ghazal writers of
the 20th century, Jigar Moradabadi. But while Pant made banner headlines in
newspapers, Jigar received a single column notice, buried in the inside page.
This is precisely the reason why Rahat’s
dominance of the media space following his death is such a phenomenon. Andy Warhol’s
observation is succinct: society has reached a point where everybody will have
fifteen minutes of fame. But applying this quip to Rahat Indori would be an
insult. Rahat had an extraordinary following for decades.
Rahat missed out on any personal
experience of the greats like Faani Badayuni, Jigar Moradabadi and Yaas Yagana Changezi.
He was too young. But Josh Malihabaid and Firaq Gorakhpuri were around till the
late 80s, and a 30 year old budding poet of Indore must have overlapped in a
Mushaira or two. Firaq, ofcourse, taught English literature in Allahabad University,
but Josh mostly depended on feudal patronage after the abolition of zamindari in
1952. Some experiences for a man of his ego were humiliating. For instance when
Josh was introduced to the Patiala Durbar, the state’s Prime Minister Sardar
K.M. Panikkar, ill equipped to place any value on an Urdu poet, decided on a
stipend of Rs.75 per month. The Maharaja, an admirer of Josh, was embarrassed:
he increased the amount to Rs.300, a princely sum those days.
The fastidious would not rank Rahat
among the finest poets, but the poets who would qualify for their esteem would
never have audiences of thousands in their thrall, Mushaira after Mushaira, across
India, indeed, worldwide.
What will be Rahat’s place in literature?
There is a singular lack of endorsement of a large swathe of contemporary Urdu
poetry by critics, scholars, connoisseurs and those who have grown in an
informed Urdu milieu. Ironically, this turns out to be in inverse proportion to
the unprecedented popularity of poets like Rahat. How does one explain this
equation? It is almost axiomatic that with rising egalitarianism a taste for classics
will decline. This truism was advanced for classical music too. It was a
touching dependence on feudal patronage, as Jawed Naqvi recently reminded us, that
caused the great Sarod maestro, Ustad Hafiz Ali Khan (Amjad Ali Khan’s father)
to refuse any recording of his performances: “I don’t want my music to be
played in city squares and paan shops.”
The danger of feudal patronage drying up
was real but mostly in North India. The South remains much the more civilized thanks
to such institutionalized treats in dance and music annually as “The Season” in
Chennai. In the Hindi belt, just as the feudal patronage tapered off,
enlightened business houses like the Bharatrams, Charatrams and the Sarabhais
stepped in massively. They have now been superseded by the unbelievable
explosion of music on the social media. Everything, from the earliest
recordings in 1900, is available with the flip of a switch.
Compared to music, the graph of Urdu
poetry is more complex. After Partition it was assumed that interest in Urdu
would decline. Josh Malihabadi’s dictum that “a language which does not give
you bread will die” did operate to the extent that the number of scholars,
critics, indeed even university faculties dwindled. A more formal and educated
appreciation of poetry was a distinct casualty. Highbrow literature did begin to make way for more
popular genres. But Urdu was able to frequently shock those who had written its
obituary. Never was this shock more telling than during the unprecedented
success of Jashn e Rekhta, a celebration of Urdu in all its forms, an annual
carnival which fills up half a dozen venues at New Delhi’s National Stadium day
and night for three days. This brainchild of a remarkable cultural entrepreneur
Sanjiv Saraf is an unparalleled contribution towards uplifting the drooping
morale of Urduwallas. Urdu’s demise, in any case, was prematurely predicted
after the resilience it had demonstrated in Bollywood in the field of lyrics, diction,
dialogues both, their content and delivery. Little wonder, Rahat became a
sought after lyricist with music directors like Anu Malik and A.R. Rehman.
Artist M.F. Hussain became one of Rahat’s
obsessive admirers after watching him keep a packed hall spellbound during a
poetic symposium in Qatar. They became close friends. In fact the cover of one
of Rahat’s collections, has been designed by Hussain.
There is stunning irony about his death.
Rahat wrote:
“Waba phaili hui hai har taraf
Abhi mahaul mar jaane ka naheen”
(A pandemic is spreading everywhere
This is not the proper season to die.)
The poet who wrote these lines is
declared Corona positive on the night of August 10 and is dead by August 11. Is
there a galloping strain of Corona?
Remember how Habib Jalib’s “Main naheen manta”
became an iconic song during the anti-citizenship stir? Equally evocative and
direct was Rahat’s couplet:
“Sabhi ka khoon hai shamil yahan ki
mitti mein;
Kisi ke baap ka Hindostan thodi hai”
(The blood of all of us has mingled in
this soil;
Hindostan is not the property of anybody’s
father)
# # # #
No comments:
Post a Comment