Thursday, October 30, 2025

Thrusting Victory On Netanyahu Trump Plan Has Chosen Narrative Over Facts

Thrusting Victory On Netanyahu Trump Plan Has Chosen Narrative Over Facts

                                                                                      Saeed Naqvi


Muslim countries assembled at Sharm al Sheikh in Egypt, to endorse Trump’s Peace Plan were Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Malaysia, Indonesia and Pakistan. None among these participated in the two year Israeli-Gaza conflict.

Muslim countries in the region that fought for the Palestinians were not present. These countries were Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen. Two other countries left out were Bahrain which has an overwhelming Shia population and Kuwait which has a substantial Shia population. The Shias in these Sheikhdoms are on a short leash.

In brief, countries which gave military and political support to Hamas, and therefore the Palestinian cause, were all Shia and were not present at Sharm al Sheikh. Would Hamas or the Palestinians leap with joy at a plan in which neither they nor their supporters have any space?

To widen the Shia-Sunni divide has been a western pursuit for decades. I remember the late Henry Kissinger describe the sectarian divide as the dominant theme defining West Asian politics which subsumes the Palestinian issue. Whoever scripted Trump’s plan had this long term perspective.

When the late King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia returned in February 2011 from convalescing in Germany, he found that two pillars of the West, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and Zine El Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia had become casualties of the Arab Spring.

King Abdullah rained $136 billion on his people. He worked behind the scenes to ignite the Syrian Civil war in 2011 as the first phase of disrupting what was named the Shia arc – Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas and, the ultimate trophy, Iran.

If the Saudi population was so agitated by the Arab Spring as to warrant the showering of billions to calm them, surely a two year long genocide of Muslims next door would have caused greater agitation among the Saudi public. Was all the speculation about Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman straining at the leash to rush into relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords not tinged with wishful thinking? Chinese generally get involved in initiatives after carefully weighing the consequences. They are invested in a Riyadh-Tehran rapprochement.

A Palestinian state in any form is anathema to Netanyahu and Israel’s Right. What then is the basis for any speculation of a Saudi interest in the Abraham Accords “unless Israel accepts a two state solution?”

Even though Hamas was ideologically a direct descendent of Hasan al Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, its Sunni antecedents were seldom underlined for emphasis because that would confuse the theory of the Shia arc.

The Times of Israel has touched a very raw nerve in the Jewish state. “Hamas isn’t behaving like a defeated force, which puts the entire Gaza ceasefire at risk.” Why? Because the Israelis know that victory has been thrust upon them by the Trump plan.

This means that considerable care was taken for the tamasha mounted in the Israeli Knesset on October 13 to make it an occasion for Israeli victory. Three distinct forces were brought together. It were these three who coordinated action to make possible history’s greatest televised genocide for two years.

The three forces responsible for the genocide had all been carefully assembled that day in the Knesset – Benjamin Netanyahu, Donald Trump and Miriam Adelson whom Trump introduced as “Miriam, with $60 billion in the bank”, obviously a pillar of the celebrated Israel lobby in the US.

When this, the most powerful trio was celebrating Trump’s peace plan, and the fact that “all of Netanyahu’s war aims had been achieved”, it was required of Hamas not to celebrate the return of Palestinian prisoners. The narrative of Israeli victory had to be amplified to such a pitch that facts are drowned.

Facts on the ground were that Netanyahu failed to bring home the hostages. It was Trump’s peace plan which facilitated the return of the Israeli hostages. He destroyed Gaza and assassinated regional leaders and scientists. Is that the stuff of victory?

Netanyahu also failed to exterminate Hamas. A pronounced schizophrenia afflicts Israel’s attitude towards Hamas: ceasefire has to be negotiated with the group but once peace has been established. Hamas must magically disappear.

The truth being obscured is this: Israel will never be able to commit the atrocities on Palestinians on the scale the world has seen on their TV screens these past two years. No genocide anymore.

The unspeakable brutality in excess of anything since the Naqba (catastrophe) in 1948 when the Jewish state was founded, will become an impossibility for two reasons: public opinion in the US, has turned against unstinted American support for Israel’s inhuman behaviour with Palestinians.

Secondly, the US is rapidly losing its position as the global hegemon. The imperial hegemon which supported all Israeli impunities as a matter of policy is no longer powerful enough to ignore world opinion.

US and Israeli impunity was at its peak in the decade between the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and 9/11. This was the period when dreams of the American century received a fillip.

We now have it on good authority that in November 2001, Benjamin Netanyahu handed a list of seven west Asian countries where regime change would be affected.

Gen. Wesley Clark, NATO commander, was handed the list by an officer in the Pentagon. The list was Iraq, Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan and the ultimate trophy, Iran.

Netanyahu had spotted the sole superpower moment to have his wish list implemented. A powerful neo-con lobby in the US backed him to the hilt.

Israel lobby, Neo cons, Netanyahu had sketched their design for the future of West Asia in the sole superpower moment. Europe’s delusionary dreams of a post Ukraine “weakened” Russia are also anchored in the sole superpower moment which alas has passed. The stalemate which is holding up movement in Ukraine as well as Gaza is an enormous waste of time and hundreds of thousands of lives. The new world order may be in the distance but watch the horizon carefully and hazy outlines of it are already emerging in Silhouette.

#          #          #          #

Monday, October 6, 2025

Winners And Losers In Trump’s Peace Plan

Winners And Losers In Trump’s Peace Plan

                                                                           Saeed Naqvi


What is the urgency driving Donald Trump to push his Gaza peace plan, even by dishonest means if necessary. In his eagerness to bid for the Nobel Peace Prize, Trump resorted to subterfuge, straight forward knavery. Even more compelling than his yen for the Nobel was the pressure of global public opinion which chastises the US collaborating with Israel’s unspeakable brutality, the genocide of Gaza, frame by frame on live TV.

A peace plan developed with representatives of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan attending the UN General Assembly, was further discussed by Trump and Netanyahu in the White House.

At a parallel meeting in Doha, Qatari Prime Minister Mohammad bin Abdulrahman, Al Thani and Hamas leaders were perusing the 20 points under the microscope. At this point the text of the 20 point plan with Netanyahu in the White House and the Qataris was the same.

Then Netanyahu, Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner, a Zionist trio, got into a huddle. The text was radically altered in favour of Netanyahu, enabling him to boast in a video on the journey back to Israel. In a statement in Hebrew for Israeli television viewers, he said.

“Who would have believed this.?” Says he triumphantly. “After all the people constantly saying – you must accept Hamas’s terms, get everyone (IDF) out (of Gaza). The IDF should withdraw, Hamas can recover and it can also reoccupy the strip.” He then exploded, “No way. That’s not happening.”

He was asked if he agreed to a Palestinian state? “Absolutely not. It’s not written into the statement, but there is one thing we did say – we would strongly oppose a Palestinian state.”

This diplomacy by deception is for a singular purpose. The pariah status that is sticking to Israel and the US in equal measure has to be shuffled off somehow. The mainstream media will be required to build the narrative that Netanyahu is trying to implement the 20 point but Hamas is obstructing. A follow up meeting, one of many expected is going on in Egypt.

Fortunately for the Palestinian, this media’s credibility is at its lowest for having been consistently in the service of establishments.

In the plan is an idea to have a “Board of Peace”, with Trump as its Chairman and President. In an aside he said he may not have the time to be hands-on all the time. It was for this reason that former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair will be on the “Board”.

There is no guarantee that the Trump plan will fly, but it does provide a clue to the plan having been tailored for right wing Zionist acceptability. The response from the Iran Supreme leader’s office hits the nail on the head: the plan gives to Netanyahu what he could not achieve on the battlefield: return of the hostages and an end to Hamas.

The irony is that the plan, even with this interpretation, is unacceptable to the Ben Gwir-Smotherick duet who want the Palestinians to disappear or live in other countries. Even though the plan gives to Netanyahu all that he could have hoped for, there remains a vast stretch on Israel’s Right, Far Right and Far Far Right capable of throwing a ginger fit if anything short of the Biblical plan for greater Israel is accepted.

Palestinians may be forgiven for being shocked at Tony Blair being inserted in matters concerning their future. Trump would have to search all corners of the globe to find a western leader more despised by Palestinians than Tony Blair, an exceptional favourite with Zionists.

Blair’s other claim to fame is the way he was chastised by the Chilcot report. Sir James Chilcot, after a six year investigation, shamed Blair for having misled the British public for joining the Iraq war in 2003. I remember him crying with copious tears for having been caught cheating.

The idea of privatizing the administration of Gaza at some later date is not without precedent. A plan to privatize the war in Afghanistan was drawn up in 2017 by Eric Prince, founder of Blackwater, the world’s biggest outlet for mercenary troops. Steve Bannon, Trump’s Chief of Staff, in Trump’s first administration forwarded a 100 page project to the White House suggesting that the US should hand the Afghan responsibility to private hands.

The British Raj’s administration was in the hands of the Viceroy. That precisely was the model offered by Prince. The project would cost 5 trillion, after which, in the hands of merry capitalism, the investment would start showing returns.

Astonishing though it may seem, this over-the-top plan had acquired life in the corridors of the White House until Secretary of Defence Gen. Jim Mattis shot it down.

If Hamas returns the hostages, what leverage will be left with it to deal with unreliable adversaries? The next hand has to be played in such a way as to retain global sympathy that Palestinians have earned by suffering genocide for two years.

It is a tough gamble. If Hamas returns the hostages, it loses leverage against a heartless opponent. If it does not return the hostages at this sensitive moment, it begins to lose global sympathy accumulated over two years of suffering.

When Yahya Sinwar and other Hamas commanders shook the world by their audacity on October 7, 2023, what were they looking for? Surely they were not embarked on a quest for quick victory over the region’s most powerful nation.

They had with clever deliberation provoked Israel expecting retaliation on a massive scale. If this indeed was their calculation they have succeeded in igniting world public opinion against Israel and its material, moral and political supporter – the US.

An opiated world has been woken up by Israeli genocide, non stop for two years. Even a Zionist supporter, Secretary of State Marco Rubio had to blurt out the truth, unpalatable to the Zionists surrounding Trump. “Israel is no longer liked in America.” The great Israel lobby in the US will probably get into a huddle and sink in the deepest layers of thought.

#          #          #          #