Have They Traded Sanctity Of Test Cricket Season For IPL Money?
Saeed Naqvi
West Indies cricket
commentator, Tony Cozier’s death last month brings to an end the phase in
cricket when the game’s live transmission depended on the spoken word. Radio
was king. John Arlott, our very own Vizzy, Devraj Puri, Dicky Rutnagur, Nobby
Clark, Pearson Surita – a procession passes by. Control on diction, descriptive
passages, tone, measured pauses, humour – this is how cricket was packaged to
us in our school days. Richie Benuad was the master of commentary in the TV era.
With the briefest of interventions, he magnified the fine point.
With the first hint of winter,
came the announcement of the visiting team for a five test series. Scrap books
were out, the size of a broadsheet. With such diligence, we pasted pictures of
batsmen and bowlers who promised to dominate the series. A column was saved for
averages. The first three day encounter with the Cricket Board President’s XI
was always in Pune.
My autograph book at school represented
my two earliest interests: Urdu poetry and cricket. From right to left were
autographs of all the poets beginning with Josh Malihabadi. Frank Worrel was
the most exotic name in the list of cricketers.
Cultural schizophrenia was our
lot from the beginning. I opened my eyes in an environment rich with Urdu, but
was put through paces in English to keep the wolf from the door. That was one
explanation for my bifocal autograph book. There was also a more
straightforward explanation. Urdu poetry as well as cricket, blossomed and
mellowed in the shadow of a declining feudal system.
The sheer poetry of players in
white against the lush green was enhanced by Dom Moraes’ Green is the Grass
which he wrote when he was 13. Little wonder he went onto win the Hawthornden
Award for poetry at Oxford. Literature and cricket mingled a little more in
Neville Cardus’ writings, stocked in the school library.
With these aesthetics, the
mind is liable to go into a tizzy at an American sporting arena – baseball,
basketball or what they call football. The tinsel razzmatazz, the carnival
atmosphere, cheer girls et al are not without their attractions but they were
so different from anything one experienced in India, West Indies, England.
Some clubs across the US played
against each other and called it the “world series”. The rest of the world was
presumed beaten. It was American exceptionalism at its peak. It would have been
quite harmless had it not been accompanied by a very American desire to see the
world in its own image.
Macdonalds, Martinis,
Manhattans on the rocks, are all American exports. In cricketing terms, it was
left to the Australian media tycoon, Kerry Packer to graft American sporting
culture onto cricket. That is how World Series Cricket was born.
We had embraced the Packer
package and that is how the ODIs were born. That was the thin end of the wedge.
Rampaging capitalism was to drive home the advantage. Money, and not the
aesthetics of cricket, became the primary consideration. In one fell swoop,
Lakshmi had snatched the game away from Saraswati and shaped it for the marketplace.
IPL cricket was born.
In the corner of the West View
bar at Kolkata’s ITC Sonar Bangla, grumbled Morne Morkel, “its killing the
game”. But on a high bar stool, Wasim Akram was holding forth. “T20 has come to
stay” he grinned from ear to ear.
Not just Wasim, other greats
in Cricket’s Hall of Fame, have traded their stature for sinecures in the
burgeoning IPL fraternity. It is a Faustian bargain. They diminish. Test cricket
diminishes most. Really, for a handful of silver..….? I am actually filled with
remorse being tardy in my admiration for Virat Kohli. He may be doing wonderful
things for IPL but I cannot help feeling that it must be at the cost of test
cricket. He ranks with our greatest test batsmen already. Eleven centuries in
41 tests is an amazing record. That should have been his trajectory. A leading
newspaper recently described Virat as “Bradman of T20”. Frankly, he stands more
circumscribed than praised in that editorial.
Admittedly, T20s have
transformed fielding into an art form. Sensational catches have been taken. But
what else? By universal consent, the format has been a bowler’s graveyard. With
decline in bowling standards, is great batsmanship possible? Neville Cardus
described a great batsman as one who was “courageous and skilful in the face of
a fine attack”. What “fine attack” when low cunning will do – bowl yorkers on
the tenth stump.
T20 or the Big Bash tamashas
will draw crowds. But these are not cricket crowds. These are T20 crowds.
Cricketing respectability has been accorded to these events by once big names
in cricket who are in quest of not just post retirement sinecures but also a
little bit of the spotlight. Imagine, Balasaraswati and Yamini Krishnamuthy
choreographing Bollywood item girls or Bade Ghulam Ali Khan singing “Biwi
number one”.
If T20 were a passing squall
which would leave our test cricket untainted, I would make my adjustments. But
I do not trust our ability to stand our ground. We only talk of tradition and
culture but are easily swept off our feet. Other cricketing countries may have
dabbled with IPL type variations. But they have held on tenaciously to their
traditions of test cricket. Come Boxing Day, and Melbourne cricket ground will be
filled to capacity. A roar will go up as the two umpires amble towards the
pitch, signaling the start of a test match. There will be no compromise on a
five test series.
Even as I write, England are
playing a somewhat one sided series against a depleted Sri Lanka side. But that
slow hand clap at Lords is still music to cricketing ears. Their seasons for
test cricket are sacrosanct.
We have become an economic
power house in cricket. But, alas, we have surrendered the sanctity of our five
test cricket season to the profligacy of the market place.
# # # #
I like PM Modi. If you are looking for new fitted sheets, click here Online Shopping Store
ReplyDeleteBeautifully written. Again.
ReplyDeleteBeautifully written. Again.
ReplyDelete