Globalization
Of Terror: Syrian Intelligence Sheds Light On Rohingya Exodus
Saeed Naqvi
Evidence of Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine
state since the 7th century is not accompanied by a narrative of
harmony with the Buddhist majority in Burma (Myanmar) throughout this period.
But since the 1970-80, increased repression, economic deprivation, denial of
citizenship rights could possibly be because of the reverberations following the
Iranian revolution in 1979.
Saudi Arabia, particularly shaken by the
emerging, bipolarity in the Muslim world, took the lead in drumming up an anti
Shia hysteria. Riyadh had an interest in diverting the world’s attention
towards Iran because a much bigger danger had reared its head within Saudi
society. An anti monarchy, radical, Islamic group had occupied Islam’s most
important mosque in Mecca for weeks almost at the same time as the Iranian
revolution. Saudi needed to create Wahabi enclaves wherever they could.
This brief background is essential to
understand antecedents to the current exodus of 4,00,000 Rohingyas.
There is a twist to the Rohingya tale,
particularly the unprecedented military crackdown in August resulting in the
refugee crisis. A source for this narrative has been the unlikely figure of
Grand Mufti Ahmed Bader Eddin Mohammad Adib Hassoun, Syria’s highest religious
authority on a visit to India last week.
The Mufti deserves to be introduced.
If conversation is the art of hearing
and of being heard, one half of that dictum is totally ignored by this cleric,
donning the grandest headgear. Seated at the head of a long dining table, his
speech is an unstoppable torrent. In this instance, it serves a purpose: it
enables the guests to relish, with dedication, a multi course feast, something
which has gone out of fashion from the current relatively frugal, diplomatic
fare.
Scattered throughout the Mufti’s elaborate
exposition are nuggets of information. If these are “plants”, why would New
Delhi accord hospitality to a cleric at a fairly high level? He met Home
Minister, Rajnath Singh. The office of the National Security Adviser gave him
quality time, as did Kashmir Chief Minister, Mehbooba Mufti and several others.
Clearly, the Mufti is well briefed on the post conflict mopping up operation in
various parts of Syria. There is priceless intelligence scattered all around.
Americans no longer deny that they have
from time to time fallen back on militants or terrorist groups as tactical
assets. In an interview to Christiane Amanpour, Russian Foreign Minister,
Sergey Lavrov made exactly that allegation and Amanpur would not risk a counter
allegation, even a question. Heaven knows what beans Lavrov might spill on live
TV.
Since the Mufti’s visit, a disturbing
piece of information circulating in some circles concerns the Rohingyas. It
makes their plight even more tragic. According to this narrative the present
crisis was precipitated from outside.
The story begins in 2012 when Prince
Bandar bin Sultan, former Saudi Ambassador to the US (nicknamed Bandar Bush
because of his friendship with George W. Bush), who had then been given the
“Syrian portfolio” by the late King Abdullah, invited a Rohingya named Hafiz
Taha, to his office in Riyadh.
Taha was given the task to develop
“Islamist sleeper cells” in Rakhine. The idea was twofold: to promote Islamism
of the Wahabi variety among a people who were otherwise inclined towards a
folksy form of Sufism. The second purpose was to sow seeds of long term
conflict in a country abutting China’s Kunming (Yunnan). There is some anxiety
in the West that parts of Mandalay are increasingly Chinese dominated.
In her study on the Rohingyas for the
Council on Foreign Relations, Eleanor Albert’s version tallies with the Mufti’s
narrative on how the trouble started in Rakhine in August. Arakan Rohingya
Salvation Army “claimed responsibility for attacks on police and army posts.”
Is it any surprise that the government declared ARSA a terrorist organization?
It was then that the military mounted a “brutal campaign that destroyed
hundreds of Rohingya villages and forced more than five hundred thousand
Rohingya to leave Myanmar, approximately half of the Rohingya population out of
the country.”
Military brutality never seen in history
was then unleashed: security forces allegedly opened fire on fleeing civilians
and planted land mines near the border crossings used by the Rohingyas to flee
to Bangladesh.
A long simmering conflict, intensifying
over the past decade, was custom made for outsiders to ignite and cause an
explosion. This precisely is what appears to have been precipitated in Rakhine
state two months ago. “But why would sleeping cells be activated now?”
US Intelligence agencies learnt a lesson
from turning their back on Afghan militants after they had helped expel the
Soviet Union from Afghanistan in 1989. This reservoir of lethal Islam, found
work for itself in Kashmir, Egypt, Algeria and so on. Since the genie could not
be put back in the bottle, Saudis, under western supervision, began to refine
Islamic terror as an exportable asset.
Much of the cloak and dagger US
operations became public either at Senate hearings on the Hill or through
diplomatic leaks. After all, nothing could be hidden from the Russians in Syria
because they had boots on the ground.
In the Syrian whodunit, Americans have actually been
admitting their mistakes with endearing docility. Remember Secretary of Defence
Ashton Carter, his face distinctly in the lower mould, being grilled by a
congressional committee, then by the media, for the clumsiness of US Special
Operations in Syria? The “moderates” they were training left their weapons with
the Al-Nusra Front and sought safe passage. Carter announced, on live cameras,
that a $500 million training programme had been discontinued.
Remember Gen. Lloyd Austin admitting to
the Armed Services Committee of the Senate that “only four or five” fighters
trained by the Americans were “in the fight.”
In an interview to Thomas Friedman of
the New York Time in 2015, President Barack Obama admitted that he had not
bombed ISI when it first reared its head because “that would have relieved
pressure on Iraq’s Shia Prime Minister, Nouri al Maliki” whose departure, and
not ISI’s elimination, was a US priority.
The cake for flaunting terrorism as an
asset goes to Bandar bin Sultan who promised a “terrorism free Sochi Olympics” in
February 2014 to Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin if only the Russians helped him
show Bashar al Assad the door out of Damascus.
The plight of those in the Rohingya
exodus is even more heart breaking because they have no hint of the Kafkian
script which has maliciously affiliated then with the externally financed Rohingya
Salvation Army, a group they know nothing about.
# # # #
No comments:
Post a Comment